Collective Bargaining Agreement Construction Industry
The parties recommend that procedures for absences caused by the temporary care of a child under the age of 10 be included in the agreement on the self-reporting procedure. Groups such as the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC),  Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC),  Construction Industry Roundtable (CIRT), the National Federation of Independent Affairs (NFIB), the National Black Chamber of Commerce(U.S. Chamber of Commerce) have actively opposed the use of PLA, particularly for government projects. These groups have questioned the application of such agreements through litigation, lobbying and public relations campaigns.  Opponents of the PLA supported Bush`s executive order, which prohibits government-mandated LBAs, and argued that between 2001 and 2008, when the executive order was in effect, no federal project had experienced significant work problems, delays or cost overruns due to the absence of ALP.  According to the applicants, who oppose THE ACCORDS, the agreements restrict the recruitment and work practices of contractors and may result in higher costs for project owners.  One of their objections to the PLA is that the agreements require contractors to contribute to union performance plans and comply with the labour rules of trade unions.  In addition, they oppose the use of LDCs to limit the hiring of projects to construction workers who have been chosen by unions through tenant unions, and argue that this does not improve the quality of workers, since all those who are admitted to a trade have at least the same level of education and qualification. , whether or not they belong to a union.  Another area of discussion is the proportion of trade unionists. Opponents say that after the PLA, business leaders must hire their workers through unions and unionized workers are the majority of those working on PLA projects, although non-unionized workers make up the majority of construction workers.
 Estimates of the proportion of non-unionists cited by PLA opponents are about 85%, based on figures from the Us Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics and more recent data put the figure at 86.9%.  This figure is disputed by Denas, who indicates that the figures of opponents of the PLA are misleading and are based on census data that included an overly broad concept of a construction worker.  According to a 2010 Cornell University study cited by Mary Vogel, Executive Director of the Construction Institute, 60% of construction trades are unionized in Massachusetts.  Since its inception in 1998, The Construction Institute, a non-profit organization, has focused on the needs of the construction union sector in Massachusetts. On 9 May 2018, the Finnish Construction Union and the Finnish Construction Industry Association (RT) negotiated an agreement between the trade unions for all sectors. On 15 May 2018, the board of directors of the Finnish construction union accepted the agreements which were then accepted by the employers` organisations. Government-mandated AEPs have been the subject of much discussion, particularly for publicly funded projects.  The implementation of project work contracts is supported by construction unions and by some political figures who say that it is necessary to ensure that large, complex projects are completed on time and on time.
 In the view of those who support the use of such agreements, THE PLA allows project owners to control costs and ensure that there is no disruption to the construction plan, for example. B by strikes.  In particular, TPC proponents refer to the inclusion in the agreement of clauses that agree to create committees to address labour management issues that deal with planning, quality control, health and safety and productivity issues during the project.  They also note that the AEPs ensure that the recruited workforce is trained and of high quality.  The use of PLA in large private construction projects such as